Some of you may have seen Jenee Desmond Harris’ piece in the Root last week. In it, she says that perhaps Black women can learn from Michelle Obama by letting go of our shallow “requirements”: a college degree (or two), a house, a “good” job (think Capitol Hill or a Consulting firm), and yes, “swagger.”
But now there’s a follow up from a male perspective. This week, David Swerdlick’s piece entitled “What Women Can’t Learn from Michelle” really sparked my attention:
You can’t argue with Jenée’s thesis: her coterie of pedigreed, upwardly mobile black women have to dig deeper for unseen potential if they’re looking for “Mr. Right.”
But if Barack Obama Part Deux is what it’s going to take to satisfy them, then her advice is going to leave a lot of women single as hell.
Personally, I blame Dwayne Wayne. Those endless reruns of your favorite episodes of A Different World get y’all completely twisted when it comes to evaluating a potential mate. But that’s beside the point. Here are a few tips to straighten things out:
Stop comparing regular guys to Barack Obama.
I can only speak for myself—I’m biracial, went to some pretty decent schools and spent most of my 20s in a cramped bachelor pad—but that’s where the comparisons to Barack Obama end. There’s nothing cool or Kravitz-esque to see here—I’m the other kind of mixed guy, in need of a tan and a fade. Picture Benjamin Jealous after six weeks on Survivor.
He had me at hello.
So many women–especially in DC–are on a mission for their Barack Obama. Now I know this goes against my past views about this topic, and I have to say that after much thought, I think that perhaps the “find your next Barack Obama” meme is over the top and, in a word, a little silly. There is only one woman for Barack Obama, and that’s Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama.
But beyond that, I think what what Swerdlick is getting at is that many women look at the wrong things: we are looking for some inkling of Presidential Swagger that may not be there because, well, the guy you’re peeping at the happy hour is not the President at all. And he may never be President. Sad, but true.
Stop looking at his checkbook and start updating your playbook.
Just because a man can “afford” to pay for $15 apple martinis doesn’t mean he wants to. Sometimes the guy buying rounds of shots is on his third bankruptcy, and the guy drinking $2 Miller Lights owns three rental properties.
We’ll do what we have to do to get your phone number, but in case you hadn’t noticed, there’s a recession going on. If you start sizing up a man for all he’s worth right now, you’re letting him know up front that if things get too far, he’s on the hook for a three-karat rock and a mortgage on a beach house in Oak Bluffs. And if he knows that already, he might flee.
….and this isn’t to say that I don’t appreciate a man paying when we go out, but I’ll take a taco dinner at Taqueria D.F. just as happily as I would a gourmet affair at 1789. Maybe it’s the California girl in me. It’s not the price of the time you spent. It’s about the person and how happy you are with him or her.
But I wanna know who these women keeping score based on a man’s salary are…do I know them? Are we friends? …but I digress.
And then, Swerdlick gives us one last word of advice:
Start dating white, Asian and Latino men.
And while we’re on the subject, how about trying Something New?
Not into white guys? That’s too bad because I’d be willing to bet that Bill Clinton has dated more black women than Barack Obama.
Black women hoping for a monopoly on black men have to realize that they’re like General Motors in a Toyota world—either develop your own hybrid technology or prepare to go out of business.
The bottom line: Single women should avoid using Barack Obama’s résumé as a job description for a position they’re trying to fill or treating their next boyfriend like a prospective applicant.
I’ve never been a woman who claimed to only date one race or another. It would make sense to me, especially in 2009, that it’s okay to date outside of your race. So go ahead–holler at the token White guy (or girl) at The Park next Thursday 🙂
At this point in my life, I’ve dated lots of different guys–plenty of guys with good jobs and degrees from the “right schools”, plenty of boyfriends with “swagga”–and none of it really matters. What matters is that a man treats me with respect and love–and yeah, that he makes me laugh–among other thngs.
The rest is just plastic. It’s not about being in a power couple. It’s about being with someone who loves you for you. And well, shouldn’t we do the same for our mate?
4 responses to “Looking for the Next Barack? Yeah, right.”
Erin
June 17th, 2009 at 18:03
I love you because no matter where we’re coming from, you never retreat on your positions outside of doing so on your terms.
So, to you, I hop up out the bed, hit snooze until party time and then crank GO GIRL! before telling you to put on ya’ dancing shoes ’cause it’s girls night & missE is raring to cruise this weekend…
On 2nd thought, though, I do think Erin Obama sounds nice. Maybe I’ll Demi Moore their yet to be born son!
mrw
June 19th, 2009 at 19:04
Great analysis! Mad props to you for bringing it down to earth and giving it perspective. 🙂
daughterofthediaspora
July 6th, 2009 at 02:02
okay so I read the first article, and went back to read the follow up. I think they are saying some of the same things but his tone is so much more accusatory to the Black women he is speaking too. He makes some of the SAME points as the original article which means that is not that much of a vice versa response piece.
My issue is that both men and women are looking at Black women and telling them what they should or should not do. BOTH SIDES of the fence are rather focused on our role, our actions, our fixing of the issue. I am waiting for the response article that says what men can learn from Barack about dating!!!! Michelle is beautiful!! I love her style and energy but she has hard, firm opinions, she is dark skin with only shoulder length hair and as someone on the ROOT said, she is no Beyonce or video comparrison. She does not have a butt that could get her any where near KING mag (before it closed) or get her a spread on playboy. She shops at a variety of stores including simple style brands that are not high end. The list could continue into another article.
And I know I am late about reading the newer article, but can someone, anyone talk about how both “sides” of this discussion are all telling women what to do, how they need to change their standards, see things differently, how they need to change? Please and thank you!
elledub08
July 6th, 2009 at 02:20
daughter of the diaspora:
great points. One of the things I was discussing with a good male friend of mine is that a lot of the times a lot of people (the writer of both articles, “He’s just not that into you”, steve harvey (lolz) are focused on giving women rules for how to find a man, how to keep a man, how to identify a good one, etc.
meanwhile, a lot of men–especially men my age–are just as clueless about how to deal with dating and relationships
in fact, i bet if you were to ask men about this, they’d confirm that fact.
i’m not sure what it would take to start shifting so that both sides are part of the dialogue….one could argue that if you wrote relationship books/articles for men they wouldn’t read them/money wouldn’t be made….i’m wondering how true that is though.